A crash caused by a distracted driver happens fast. You can be driving normally on a Roanoke road when someone looking at their phone causes a sudden collision. Virginia law gives injured people the right to seek compensation from a driver whose distraction caused the crash. Roanoke roads, from Williamson Road to Peters Creek Road, see distracted driver crashes with troubling regularity, and you do not have to absorb the cost of someone else’s inattention alone.
Led by attorney John P. Fishwick Jr., our firm brings decades of Virginia personal injury experience to these cases. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reports that distracted driving claimed 3,208 lives in 2024. Virginia’s hands-free law, § 46.2-818.2, makes it illegal to hold a phone while driving, and breaking this rule directly supports your injury claim.
This guide explains what counts as distracted driving under Virginia law, how § 46.2-818.2 affects a claim, the most common distraction types in Roanoke crashes, how liability and damages are proven, what mistakes to avoid after a wreck, and what to expect when working with car accident lawyers in Virginia. Call Fishwick & Associates PLC at (540) 345-5890 for a free consultation.
Get a Straight Answer About Your Case
Clear Guidance From A Team That Knows How To Win
Qui Tam / Whistleblower Case
$3,000,000 Settlement
HEYtex USA, located in Pulaski, Virginia, agreed to pay $3 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act between January 1, 2013,
and December 31, 2018 when it knowingly sold fabrics to the United States military that failed to meet certain required specifications. In the settlement, the United States alleged HEYtex caused false claims to be submitted in connection with fabrics manufactured for military and personal equipment. An employee of HEYtex USA, who later came forward as a whistleblower, brought information regarding falsified test results to the attention of former company management, but the whistleblower was initially ignored. The civil settlement includes the resolution of claims brought under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act against HEYtex USA.
Car Accident Case
$1,240,000 Settlement
Mother and daughter were severely injured in a motor vehicle accident.
Truck Accident
$262,500 Settlement
Rear-end collision caused by the inebriated and exhausted driver of a box truck for his employer, resulting in minor physical injuries and anxiety to our
client, with special damages (medical bills and lost wages) under $3,000.00. Two weeks prior to this collision, the driver had wrecked another box truck for the same employer. On behalf of our client, we brought a lawsuit for both compensatory and punitive damages. The defendants asked the Court to dismiss the claims for punitive damages, but we successfully argued that they should be allowed to proceed. In the end, the case settled for $262,500.00.
Pedestrian Accident
$200,000 Settlement
Pedestrian was hit by a driver head-on, resulting in wrist and ankle fractures requiring surgery to his ankle. After our client received $25,000.00 from the driver’s insurance carrier (the policy limits), successfully mediated settlement with the client’s underinsurance provider.
Pedestrian Accident
$151,928.76 Settlement
Pedestrian hit by driver in downtown Salem, causing significant knee injury.
Rear-End Collision
$125,000 Settlement
A rear-end collision resulted in the driver, who was recovering from surgery, relapse and required additional treatment. Liability insurance carrier settled for policy limits of $25,000.00, and underinsured motorist insurance carrier settled for $100,000.00.
Car Accident Case
$100,000 Settlement
Family of three injured in auto accident caused by speeding driver, resulting in soft tissue injuries; insurance policy limits of $100,000.
Intersection Accident
$100,000 Settlement
While making a left turn, with the green light, our client was hit by another driver who ran the red light. Unfortunately, our client was unconscious after
the collision, and the other driver falsely reported that our client was at fault, and so our client was charged. After reviewing the evidence, the Commonwealth agreed to dismiss the traffic charge against our client and instead charged the other driver. Ultimately, we secured for our client the maximum liability limits of the insurance policy covering the other driver and our client’s own underinsurance.
T-Bone Collision
$87,000 Settlement
Driver struck in T-bone collision requiring brief hospitalization and approximately two months chiropractic treatment.
Head-on Collision
$85,000 Settlement
Head-on collision caused by an uninsured motorist, resulting in soft-tissue back injuries. Our client’s underinsurance policy listed available limits of
$50,000.00 despite a liability limit of $100,000.00; however, because there was no proof that insured agreed to lesser UIM coverage as required by Virginia law, the underinsurance carrier agreed that the higher policy limits would govern.
Rear-End Collision
$85,000 Settlement
Driver rear-ended while stopped at red light, resulting in back, neck, and shoulder pain and chiropractic treatment.
Rear-End Collision
$62,500 Settlement
Driver rear-ended by another drunk driver, resulting in injuries in neck, back and right shoulder injuries.
Premises Liability
$55,000 Settlement
Customer tripped over the forklift pole, resulting in right shoulder pain and extensive physical therapy.
Head-on Collision
$50,000.00 Settlement
Driver struck in head-on collision, resulting in death; total insurance policy limits of $50,000.
Car Accident Case
$50,000 Settlement
Driver hit by vehicle making improper left turn, resulting in severe neck, back, and shoulder pain.
T-Bone Collision
$50,000 Settlement
Driver struck in T-bone collision in intersection by law enforcement officer, resulting in death.
Rear-End Collision
$37,000 Settlement
Driver rear-ended by another driver, resulting in soft tissue injuries and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).
Rear-End Collision
$36,250 Settlement
Rear-end collision involving three vehicles, resulting in soft-tissue back and shoulder injuries, requiring 25 sessions of physical therapy.
Car Accident Case
$26,000 Settlement
Driver involved in crash caused by being cut off on highway, resulting in right knee swelling, bruising, and pain.
R.B.
R.B.
“I had an excellent experience working with Attorney Carrol Ching and everyone else at Fishwck and Associates. The team was very supportive and welcoming…”
A.W.
A.W.
“These guys were amazing. They pursued my case for over a year – until they finally got us a settlement. I never had to pay a penny out of pocket…”
S.M.
S.M.
“John, Amy, and Daniel were some of the most helpful people I have ever met. It was a pleasure working with them to solve my case, and highly recommend anyone…”
Talk to John's Team Today
A Legal Team That Tells You What Matters Most
Distracted driving is any activity that pulls a driver’s attention away from the safe operation of a vehicle. Traffic safety researchers recognize three kinds of distraction: visual, manual, and cognitive. Distraction goes well beyond phone use. Eating, adjusting the radio, or simply losing focus can all count.
Visual distraction means taking your eyes off the road. Reading a text, glancing at a GPS screen, or watching a roadside event all qualify. On busy corridors like Brambleton Avenue, even a one- or two-second glance away can cause a driver to miss stopped traffic or a pedestrian in a crosswalk.
Manual distraction means taking your hands off the wheel. Eating, drinking, adjusting controls, or grooming are common examples. These behaviors often appear in crash reports when a responding officer documents food containers, spilled drinks, or other items inside the vehicle.
Cognitive distraction means taking your mind off driving. Hands-free phone calls, daydreaming, and absorbing conversations all reduce a driver’s attention even when both hands stay on the wheel. Cognitive distraction is harder to prove than texting, but it can still support a negligence claim when other evidence shows the driver was not paying attention.
J.G.
J.G.
“Mr. Fishwick and his team will use everything at their disposal to fight for your rights. Not only is everyone professional and focused at the office, they are very kind…”
K.G.
K.G.
“I can’t say enough good things about this law firm and the people who work here. John and his associates were nothing but helpful from the moment I walked …”
M.M.
M.M.
“When my partner and I were hit by a semi-truck, we weren’t sure who to turn to or what to do. Daniel, John, Amy, and their whole team were exceptional throughout…”
Virginia’s hands-free law, § 46.2-818.2, makes it unlawful for any person to hold a handheld personal communications device while driving a moving vehicle on Virginia highways. Drivers can legally make hands-free calls, but physically holding the phone is prohibited. A violation strengthens a civil injury claim because it shows the driver broke a safety law.
The statute lists five situations where the hands-free rule does not apply. These exemptions are narrow and do not cover ordinary drivers engaged in routine phone use:
Penalties increase for repeat violations and for offenses in work zones. Receiving a traffic citation does not limit a driver’s financial liability in a civil lawsuit. The fine is paid to the Commonwealth, while your injury claim seeks compensation for your losses.
| Violation | Penalty Under § 46.2-818.2 |
|---|---|
| First offense | $125 fine |
| Second or subsequent offense | $250 fine |
| Violation in a highway work zone | Mandatory $250 fine |
B.R.
B.R.
“My brother and I really appreciate the work that Fishwick & Associates did for us on our Mothers’ “Wrongful Death” suit. Everybody was so kind, generous, and helpful…”
E.P.
E.P.
“After my accident I called around to different law firms only to be told they wouldn’t be able to help me “because I didn’t have broken bones. I came…”
E.I.
E.I.
“I truly cannot express how wonderful of an experience I had working with Fishwick and Associates. Daniel Martin is fierce and did an outstanding job with my case…”
Start With a Free Conversation
A Simple First Step Toward Protecting Your Rights
John P. Fishwick Jr. is a Roanoke native and a nationally recognized trial lawyer who represents individuals throughout Virginia. From 2015 to 2017, he served as the United States Attorney for the Western District of Virginia after being appointed by President Obama and unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate. He earned his J.D. from Washington and Lee University School of Law in 1983, where he served as a Note and Comment Editor of the Washington and Lee Law Review. He earned his B.A. from Harvard University in 1979.
John P. Fishwick Jr. handles personal injury, wrongful death, and federal criminal matters, and he appears regularly as a legal analyst on national media. He has been selected for Virginia Super Lawyers and Best Lawyers of America for many years. At Fishwick & Associates PLC, our legal team fights for the rights of distracted driving injury victims across Southwest Virginia and the entire Roanoke Valley.
Smartphone use is widely recognized as a leading distraction in Roanoke car accidents, but the scope of the problem extends far beyond texting. Official data from the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles reveals that 20,758 crashes were attributed to distracted driving across the state in 2024. In the majority of these incidents, investigators found that a driver simply taking their eyes off the road was the primary factor.
Texting remains the most common and most documented distraction. Sending or reading a text takes a driver’s eyes off the road for about five seconds. At highway speed, that is enough time to travel the length of a football field nearly blind.
Touchscreen infotainment systems are a growing danger because they combine visual, manual, and cognitive distraction in one device. Even though this technology is marketed as a convenience, built-in screens pull a driver’s focus away from the road for far longer than most people realize.
Technology is not the only hazard; traditional distractions cause thousands of collisions every year. Eating behind the wheel, turning around to talk to passengers, swatting at bugs inside the cabin, and reaching for a pet moving freely inside the vehicle all pull critical focus away from driving. Even external factors, like staring at billboards or slowing down to look at roadside crashes, frequently lead to devastating rear-end accidents.
M.C.
M.C.
“Without any hesitation I can highly recommend John Fishwick along with his highly talented and dedicated legal team at Fishwick & Associates. They utilize everyday...”
M.D.
M.D.
“My wife, daughter and toddler grandchildren were involved in a very bad automobile accident, and John Fishwick and his team have been most responsive...”
T.H.
T.H.
“I’m so happy that this legal team won my case. Mr. Fishwick, Mr. Daniel Martin, and Amy did an excellent job! I was constantly getting updates on my case which really helped….”
You prove distraction by gathering evidence quickly before it disappears. Distraction is rarely admitted, so building a strong case usually depends on combining several sources of proof.
Call logs, text timestamps, and app activity can all be subpoenaed after a crash. Virginia courts allow this discovery when the records are relevant to the claim. These records can show whether the driver was actively using the device at the moment of impact.
Video is often the clearest proof of distraction. Footage may come from intersection cameras, nearby business security systems, or dashcams in other vehicles. Because many systems record over old footage within days, an attorney can send a preservation letter to stop the video from being deleted.
Report the crash to the Roanoke City Police or the Virginia State Police right away. A responding officer may note signs of phone use, statements made at the scene, or the position of a device inside the car. Witnesses who saw the driver looking down can also provide valuable statements before memories fade.
Key Takeaway: Proving distraction requires acting quickly. Phone records, surveillance footage, and police reports are among the strongest forms of evidence, but they must be preserved before they are lost or overwritten.
Call Fishwick & Associates PLC at (540) 345-5890 to speak with Virginia car accident attorneys who know how to secure what matters.
More than one party can be held liable for a distracted driving crash. Identifying every liable party can mean access to additional insurance coverage.
The distracted driver is the primary defendant in most cases. A violation of § 46.2-818.2 can support a negligence per se argument, which means that breaking a safety statute is treated as evidence of negligence.
If the driver was working at the time of the crash, the employer may also be liable. Under the legal doctrine of respondeat superior, an employer can be responsible for an employee’s negligent acts committed within the scope of employment. Delivery drivers, sales representatives, and commercial truck operators are common examples.
A vehicle owner who lent the car to an unsafe driver could also be held liable.
Key Takeaway: Determining liability in a distracted driving crash often extends beyond the person behind the wheel. When an at-fault driver is on the clock or operating a company vehicle, a thorough investigation can hold the employer accountable, which frequently opens the door to higher commercial insurance policy limits to cover catastrophic injuries.
Learn More
Virginia law allows distracted driving victims to recover both economic and non-economic damages. In rare cases involving extreme conduct, punitive damages may also be available.
Economic damages compensate you for the direct, calculable financial losses caused by a crash. These concrete costs include your past and future medical bills, ongoing rehabilitation and therapy expenses, and the property damage to your vehicle. You can also recover compensation for the income you lose while recovering, including lost wages and any long-term loss of earning capacity if your injuries prevent you from returning to your previous line of work.
Non-economic damages cover losses that are real but harder to measure. These include pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of consortium. Virginia does not impose a statutory cap on these damages in most personal injury cases.
Punitive damages are available in Virginia when the conduct is willful or wanton. Deliberately using a phone at high speed in heavy traffic could potentially qualify. These awards are rare and require a high standard of proof.
Virginia follows a pure contributory negligence rule, one of the strictest in the country. Under this doctrine, if a court finds you were even 1% at fault for the crash, you may be barred from recovering any compensation at all. This stands in sharp contrast to comparative fault states, where partial fault only reduces an award rather than eliminating it.
This rule is the main reason having a Virginia car accident attorney matters from day one. Insurance adjusters know about contributory negligence and use it to evaluate claims. A simple statement that seems harmless, such as “I didn’t see them coming,” can be leveraged into an admission of shared fault. A careful investigation can document exactly how the crash happened and counter attempts to shift blame onto you.
The mistakes you make after a crash can cost you as much as the crash itself.
Recorded statements may be used against the people who give them. Avoid accepting an early settlement offer before the full extent of your injuries is known.
Evidence at the scene disappears fast. If you are physically able, take photos of vehicle damage, road conditions, skid marks, and the other driver’s phone if it is visible in hand.
Delaying a claim carries two major risks. First, Virginia Code § 8.01-243 enforces a strict two-year statute of limitations for most personal injury lawsuits. Second, long before that legal deadline expires, crucial physical evidence can disappear, and eyewitness memories will inevitably fade.
The steps you take in the first hours after a crash can shape your entire claim. If you are able, work through these steps in order:
Key Takeaway: The steps you take in the hours after a distracted driving crash in Roanoke can significantly affect the strength of your claim. Documenting the scene and getting prompt medical care creates a strong foundation for your legal counsel to protect your rights against insurance adjusters.
Fishwick & Associates PLC serves distracted driving accident victims throughout the Roanoke Valley and surrounding Virginia communities, including:
A distracted driver’s split-second decision can leave you facing months of medical treatment, lost income, and uncertainty about your future. Having an experienced attorney by your side helps you manage insurance claims, preserve crucial evidence, and build a strong case under Virginia’s strict negligence laws.
Fishwick & Associates PLC has represented injured people throughout the Roanoke Valley for decades. Our Virginia car accident attorneys know how to build distracted driving cases, from subpoenaing phone records to working with accident reconstruction professionals, and we are prepared to take your case to trial when insurers refuse to offer fair compensation.
Call Fishwick & Associates PLC at (540) 345-5890 or contact us online to schedule a free, no-obligation consultation with a Virginia car accident attorney who will give your case the attention it deserves.
Yes. State law makes it illegal to have a phone in your hand while driving anywhere in Virginia. A first-time ticket costs $125, and the fine doubles to $250 for repeat offenses or if you are caught holding a device in a highway work zone.
Yes. When an at-fault driver receives a citation for violating a safety rule like the hands-free law, it provides strong evidence for your civil case. While a ticket alone does not automatically win your lawsuit, it allows your lawyer to argue that the driver was legally negligent by breaking a traffic statute.
Because Virginia uses a strict contributory negligence standard, sharing even a tiny fraction of the blame for a collision can prevent you from receiving financial compensation. Having an attorney review your case before you talk to an adjuster is crucial.
You typically have two years from the date of the crash to formally file a personal injury lawsuit, according to Virginia Code § 8.01-243. If you miss this two-year window, the court will likely dismiss your case entirely. Furthermore, reaching out to a legal team early helps secure critical evidence before it disappears.
If the at-fault driver was performing job duties when the crash occurred, such as making a delivery or driving a company vehicle, the employer may also be liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior. These cases can involve additional insurance coverage and more extensive discovery.
Yes. Virginia’s wrongful death statute, § 8.01-50, allows surviving family members, including spouses, children, and parents, to pursue a claim when a loved one is killed by another person’s negligence. A Virginia car accident attorney can explain who qualifies as a beneficiary and what damages may be available.
No. Even when your hands stay on the wheel, talking on a hands-free system takes your mind off the road. If a driver causes a crash because they were mentally distracted by a phone conversation, they can still be held legally responsible for the damage.